Skip to main content
Engineering

Git Workflows That Don't Make You Want to Quit

October 25, 20259 min read
GitVersion ControlWorkflowDevOpsBest Practices
Share:

I've worked with GitFlow on larger projects. Feature branches, develop branches, release branches, hotfix branches. The branch graph looked like a subway map. Merging a feature required a PhD in conflict resolution.

Now I use trunk-based development. One branch. Ship from main. My deploy frequency went from weekly to daily.

Why Most Git Workflows Are Over-Complicated

GitFlow was designed for software that ships quarterly on physical media. If your deployment process involves burning a CD, you need release branches.

If you deploy by merging to main and Vercel/GitHub Actions handles the rest, you don't need 90% of GitFlow.

What I Actually Do

\\

Related reading

All posts →
Jason Teixeira
Written by
Jason Teixeira
Founder, Sage Ideas Studio
More about Jason →

Want to see this in action?

Check out the projects and case studies behind these articles.

livebuild 29be8ec2026-06-11 06:38Z
// solo studio// no analytics resold// every commit human-reviewed